$Account.OrganizationName
Customer Manufacturing Update )
Creating Competitive Advantage Through Marketing/Sales Process Improvement

February 2009
in this issue
  • Marketing Performance Management
  • Commentary on this year's Super Bowl Ads
  • The Man Who Sold Hot Dogs
  • Closing Thoughts
  • Dear Mitchell,

    Here is your February Customer Manufacturing Update. For several years now, Marketing ROI, Marketing Accountability and Metrics have been topics of purported interest to Boards of Directors, CEOs and CMOs. But to quote a friend and colleague, the late George Nelson, is this all just NATO (No Action, Talk Only). This month were going to look at why you need to take appropriate action on these important topics. methods to help you do just that.

    If you have friends or colleagues who would appreciate receiving this Update, feel free to forward a copy to them using the "Forward e-mail" link at the bottom of the page.



    Marketing Performance Management

    We have been preaching for 10+ years that marketing/sales is a process that can be measured, managed and improved. A few years ago we noticed that others were beginning to take up the mantra, especially on the Marketing-side. People started to push on Marketing Performance Management.

    What is your department, division, or company doing in this area ... besides talk?

    If you work in Marketing are you just hoping this too will pass? If you are a CMO are you struggling to try to outlast the 24 month life-cycle driven by the rebrand, relaunch, resign steps in the typical CMO's strategy for success? If you are the CEO or a Board member are you just frustrated that Marketing Performance Management has not gone beyond a lot of "talk."

    If you are ready to move beyond talk, hope or hiding we have several resources available to help you improve your Marketing Performance and to Manage it for continuous improvement. This includes our breakthrough book, Value Acceleration: Secrets To Building An Unbeatable Competitive Advantage, as well as several white papers including:

    And, of course, highly effective process-focused consulting services to help you achieve higher Marketing Performance and an on-going ability to Manage it.

    Commentary on this year's Super Bowl Ads

    Like most marketing "experts," we comment on Super Bowl ads every year. This year is no exception. Things we noticed this year:

    • There is no real consensus among pundits as to the "best" ad
    • Most everyone feels that the ad "quality" is dropping. I believe it is no longer a "spectacle" for the advertisers. This is potentially troubling because people have historically actually watched Super Bowl ads and if they stop because there is no real difference between a Super Bowl ad and a "regular" ad, then actual viewership of the ads will drop and companies will question their ad spending for the Super Bowl (as Fed Ex and GM did this year). This will impact ad revenue for the network that broadcasts the event. Who knows, maybe the Super Bowl becomes a pay-per-view event.
    As always, each "expert" has their own criteria for critiquing the ads. So do we.

    We believe that ads need a purpose and that the purpose needs to be achieved for the ad to be successful. We see a few possible purposes for Super Bowl ads:

    1. To effectively deliver a message to the audience to induce trial
    2. To reinforce the company's or brand's image to its users
    3. To drive traffic to a website (which is a special case of inducing trial)
    4. To say "we advertised on the Super Bowl," which we have consistently felt is a bad purpose

    With these criteria in mind, our opinion about the ads is as follows (to be clear, we do not choose to comment on ads for movies or TV shows because those ads' quality and effectiveness are largely tied to the product they are promoting):

    1. Biggest waste: Bud Light. I counted four ads that they ran. Only one had a message and the rest had no point, and were not that entertaining either.
    2. Second biggest waste was Pepsi (other than Pepsi Max, see below): None of their ads gave you a reason to care, in fact their last ad, the spoof on McGyver even asked the question, what is the point of the ad? And they ran several ads with no message. But then so did Coke.
    3. Third biggest waste: GE. Now I know they own NBC so maybe their reasons for advertising were "corporate," but why would you advertise the electric grid on the Super Bowl? What exactly does the audience care or do with the ad?
    4. Best ad to drive people to a website: GoDaddy. They are masters at this and I am certain they got LOTS of web traffic as a result. Was that traffic useful in creating customers? I don't know. A few companies used their ad as a pseudo public service announcement and also drove traffic to their site. Notably Kellogg's and Pedigree.
    5. Budweiser continued their tradition of entertaining, heartwarming ads tied to the Dalmatian and the Clydesdale. They assume you know who they are and are just trying to leave with a good feeling about the company. And they do.

    Ads that we felt were "on message" and had above average entertainment value (we don't usually care about entertainment value except in the Super Bowl venue, or others, where it is expected) included:

    • Castrol with the "grease monkeys"
    • Pepsi Max and their focus on men
    • Cars.com and the reluctance people have to buy a car due to the process. (We actually researched this phenomenon in the last recession and found people delay purchasing a car about six months to avoid/delay the pain induced by the process)
    • Hyundai's Car of the Year ad that featured all the other luxury brands. I thought this was effective because it was also self-deprecating
    • Teleflora and the flowers in a box spoof
    • Monster.com on message. We liked the CareerBuilder approach as being on message too, but the ad would have been more effective if it had been half as long
    • Hulu.com with Alec Baldwin was on message and funny

    Several pundits seemed to like the Doritos ads, especially the one where he throws the crystal ball through the vending machine. We found the Doritos ads to be less than useful or particularly entertaining.

    So, again this year, these are our opinions on the Super Bowl of advertising. BTW, good game regardless of which team you were rooting for.

    The Man Who Sold Hot Dogs

    Larry Moon, CEO of Sandstone Group in Milwaukee, WI, shared this timely story with us recently.

    There once was a man who lived by the side of the road and sold hot dogs. In fact, he sold very good hot dogs. He put up signs on the highway telling people how good his hot dogs tasted. He stood by the side of the road and called out, "Buy a hot dog, mister."

    And people bought his hot dogs. They bought so many hot dogs, the man increased his meat and bun orders. He bought a bigger stove, too, so that he could meet his customers' demands. And finally, he brought his son home from college to help out in the family business.

    But something happened. His son said, "Father, don't you watch television or read the papers? Don't you know there's a big recession going on? The European situation is terrible. The domestic crisis is even worse!"

    And the father thought, "Well, my son's a smart boy. He's been to college. He ought to know what he's talking about." So, the man took down the signs he had put by the road, cut down on his meat and bun orders, and no longer bothered to stand out by the side of the road to promote his hot dogs.

    And sales fell almost overnight. "You're right, son," said the father. "We certainly are in the middle of a recession."

    Circuit City is being liquidated. Economy related? Probably, but not exclusively.

    A while back Circuit City restructured their compensation plan for their sales people, effectively reducing the pay of their top performing sales people. This caused many of their top sales people to leave. Sales dropped and now bankruptcy. Cause and effect? I think so.

    Sales dropped and now liquidation. Cause and effect? We think so. And while we do not agree that all sales people need to be paid on commission, we do believe that if you reduce the pay of your top performers (in any category), the are they ones mostly likely to be attractive to your competition ... in any economy.

    Think about it. Wouldn't you love to hire your competitor's best people? (Well at least some of your competitors.)

    Closing Thoughts

    We appreciate any feedback you can provide to help us make sure these Updates give you value each month. Feel free to respond to this e-mail with any comments or suggestions for future topics or ways we can make these Customer Manufacturing Updates more valuable to you.

    Thank you for your interest, and if we can provide any additional assistance in sales, marketing, strategy, or innovation to help you increase your sales, let us know.

    Our mission is to help you improve the performance of your System to Manufacture Customers®.

    Quick Links...


    Forward email

    Safe Unsubscribe
    This email was sent to mgooze@customermfg.com by mgooze@customermfg.com.

    Customer Manufacturing Group | 1900 Wyatt Drive, #11 | Santa Clara | CA | 95054