![]() |
![]() |
Customer Manufacturing Update | ![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dear Mitchell,
Welcome to the October 2006 Customer
Manufacturing Update. This month we're focused
on Marketing ROI. If you have friends or colleagues who would appreciate receiving this e-zine, feel free to forward a copy to them using the "Forward e-mail" link at the bottom of the e-zine.
![]() CMOs, marketing directors, and marketing departments are under increasing pressure to justify their marketing activities. In an attempt to do so they have turned to the "proven" technique of ROI. While strong supporters of accountability, we are concerned that the techniques being used to justify spending (or investment as is the preferable term of use) may make things worse. In this month's white paper, Are Your Marketing Activities Worthwhile?: Why Marketing ROI Misses the Mark, Bob Johnson, of our Massachussetts office, takes a hard look at what is being used today as Marketing ROI and why those approaches may be justifying poor investment and blocking good investment. ![]()
![]() Years ago, Jeff Krawitz, from our New Jersey office, heard a talk by Buckminster Fuller, a famed futurist and thinker. He talked about creating changes, really big changes, in culture, society, and on global issues. Bucky implored each of us to be a change agent, to be a part of a shift rather than the status quo. He told us each to be a ‘trim tab’ to fight momentum and bureaucracy. Consider a large ship moving through the ocean, kept on a straight course by its rudder. When the captain initiates a change in course (what we land lubbers call a ‘turn’), the rudder shifts and pushes the ship in the new direction. However, there is substantial pressure from the moving water on each side of the rudder and it requires tremendous force to actually move the rudder to turn the ship. On the edge of the rudder is a small, moveable fin called a trim tab, the ultimate agent of change. In the normal course of events (when the ship is moving straight), the trim tab is aligned with the rudder, sliding effortlessly through the water. When a change in course is ordered, the trim tab is adjusted slightly, actually pushing the rudder to the appropriate side and causing the ship to change direction – with minimum effort. Though the captain orders the change in course, it is the trim tab that enables the ship to respond. You are a trim tab. Whether your title is CEO or clerk, you have the capability to create change in your organization. Executive management sets the course, middle management defines the direction to get there, and the trim tabs make it happen. Don’t see any trim tabs? Without the support of the ‘individual contributors’ of an organization, the CEO can proclaim all the changes in the world – and none will happen. So, from a top down perspective, trim tabs are needed to make change happen. Do trim tabs work from the bottom up? “I tried to change things once, but no one listened,” is a common response. In Disney’s movie Finding Nemo, the adolescent Nemo gets all the other ‘mature’ fish that are caught in the net with him to, “Swim down!! Swim down!!”, and ultimately avoid capture. Nemo, one small agent of change, became a trim tab and moved the entire school in a focused direction to create specific desired results. One last thought about change. In the scene from Finding Nemo described above, the ship holding the fish net nearly capsized from the collective “swimming down” of the captured fish. In other words, if management ignores the voice of the trim tabs within its organization ... We use the concept of trim tabs in many of our training programs, encouraging each trainee to use their new skills and knowledge to make a difference throughout the organization. Check our website for some of the programs that could assist your organization’s growth. ![]()
![]() Several companies are making the news today due to their failure to thrive. Ford Motor Company is the latest. The root cause of Ford's problem (and many other companies) as stated by Ford's Chairman is that their business model is no longer working. This business model failure has reached a point where the October 2, 2006 issue of Fortune magazine had a significant article on the need to adapt or radically change your business model for the future. Without patting ourselves on the back (too much), we'd like to remind you that we wrote on this subject back in January 2003. We recognized then, and continue to recognize that business model change is becoming the norm rather than the exception.
To see what we have to say on the subject, read for
the first time or re-read ![]()
![]() It is a well recognized management maxim in today’s world that each business activity should find “best practices” and seek to achieve at least that level of performance. While this might seem an obviously “good” idea, it may lead to several undesirable outcomes. Some of the more apparent limitations to an across the board, unilateral “best practices” approach include:
Beyond these three, there is a fourth and possibly more important issue: knowing what to do first. To improve the throughput of any system requires an understanding of where the constraint to throughput resides. A “mindless” focus on best practices assures that investment is made everywhere in an attempt to improve everywhere. While continuous improvement is a proven management principle, and is necessary to maintaining a competitive position in today’s world, it is not sufficient. Missing in the analysis is an understanding of where to apply additional resources first to improve results. Constraint theory tells us that applying additional resources to an unconstrained process element will not increase throughput. Therefore investing in so-called “best practices” across the board in your business is unlikely to be the optimal approach. It is analogous to attempting to increase output in a factory by maximizing the output of each work cell. This will absolutely maximize output. It will also maximize work-in-process and all related costs. Similarly, attempting to improve the performance of your company by maximizing the performance of each business activity is unlikely to be the optimal approach. The key is in understanding where the constraint to improved performance in your company is today, and focus on relieving that constraint first, then moving to the new constrained activity. This process continues indefinitely resulting in continuous improvement and optimal results. Best practices and benchmarking are useful tools to set a minimum standard of performance. They should not be the ceiling. To adapt current best practices or to find ways to create best practices involves significant investment. That investment won’t pay off if it is applied to an activity that is not a constraint to your company’s performance. To adapt another old maxim: first strive to understand what to do, then focus on the most efficient way to do it. . ![]()
![]() We appreciate any feedback you can provide to help us make sure these Updates give you value each month. Feel free to respond to this e-mail with any comments or suggestions for future topics or ways we can make these Customer Manufacturing Updates more valuable to you.
Thank you for your interest, and if we can provide
any
additional assistance in sales, marketing, strategy, or
innovation to help you increase your sales,
let us know. ![]()
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|