$Account.OrganizationName
Customer Manufacturing Update )
Creating Competitive Advantage Through Marketing/Sales Process Improvement

October 2009
in this issue
  • Control Charts
  • Investing for the recovery
  • What's the focus of a business?
  • Getting even by getting attention
  • Closing Thoughts
  • Dear Mitchell,

    Here is your October Customer Manufacturing Update. Many years ago, Ichiro Ishikawa taught that 90% of all business problems can be solved with the Seven Tools of Quality. We believe that is still true today. And if you can solve 90% of your problems, you are going to be far ahead of the competition. This month's Update focuses on another one of those tools, Control Charts.

    If you have friends or colleagues who would appreciate receiving this Update, feel free to forward a copy to them using the "Forward e-mail" link at the bottom of the page.



    Control Charts

    There are many process improvement tools available to help companies manage and improve business processes. New ones are created regularly, and many are adapted or modified as a way to try to sell you something "new." There are seven tools of quality that work. Master them for the right circumstances and you are unlikely to need much of anything else.

    In this month's white paper, we look at how to use Control Charts as a tool to improve marketing/sales.

    Investing for the recovery

    "The winners in downturns are the companies that find ways to innovate in spite of everything." This quote comes from Brian Walker, CEO of Herman Miller. Many companies believe this is true because they consider R&D an investment. Unfortunately, since Marketing is considered an expense in most companies, these same companies often cut their Marketing spend in a downturn.

    However, if you consider that Marketing is MUCH more than just the promotional/advertising function, and you believe that "new products are [y]our lifeblood" as Mr. Walker does, than perhaps you need to consider another piece of sage advice from Philip Kotler:

    "...most of the impact of marketing is felt before the product is produced, not after."

    Studies by the PDMA and others have found, consistently, that appropriate Marketing input into new product development has more leverage to success than additional investment in R&D.

    So, if you believe that innovation in terms of new product/services is key to your success coming out of this downturn, and you want to optimize your opportunity for success, we recommend you re-look at your Marketing investment to make sure it is focused where you need it to be.

    What's the focus of a business?

    As you undoubtedly know, General Motors exited from bankruptcy recently. The new company will focus on "customers, cars and culture." As part of the announcement they stated that "Top executives at the new company will focus on business results, new vehicles, brands and consumers."

    Sounds good, but what on earth else would they think they should focus on? Can you imagine a business student suggesting that a revolutionary idea for a company would be to focus on results, products, brands and customers? Ok, perhaps employees should be listed as well, but what on earth were they thinking previously?

    In line with a focus on results, products, brands, and customers, demanding accountability from Marketing has gained attention in many companies for a few years now. Metrics and dashboards have been the primary action taken by Marketing to respond to this pressure. (What better way to convince people you are "accountable" then with a cool, and expensive, dashboard which displays metrics of what you can measure rather than what you should measure.)

    We are BIG fans of metrics and accountability when done correctly. However, it is too easy to get it wrong, even at the highest level. Fritz Henderson is taking over GM (that would be the "new" GM) and as Business Week put it in their June 29 issue, he "... has been careful not to criticize Wagoner" (his predecessor). To wit, apparently Wagoner was a "data geek" who used 10 metrics to measure his executives performance. That all by itself didn't sound too bad.

    Then Henderson is said to note that all were not particularly relevant and he has "...boiled it down to the five most vital for each department, with a much greater emphasis on sales and profits." Gee, you mean the prior metrics focused on something more important than that? There is an old expression most of us have heard: What gets measured, gets managed. Since sales and profits suffered at GM, it is any wonder the metrics didn't focus on those?

    Chris Oster, their so-called organizational czar put it this way: "We got a little crazy with metrics." You think?

    The first rule of metrics and measurement is to measure that which matters. This suggests that you have to understand, accept, and agree on what matters. Then you can decide what to measure and not go "a little crazy with metrics."

    Getting even by getting attention

    In Mitch's book, It's Not Rocket Science: Using Marketing to Build a Sustainable Business (2008), he tells a story about a flight from JFK to Boston (the Pan Am Shuttle) that had landed in Hartford due to weather in Boston and been delayed four hours. The passengers were not allowed off the plane to get alternate transportation to Boston.

    A passenger complained to Pan Am and got the standard "we are not responsible for delays caused by the weather" response. Because that passenger was a writer for the New York Times, he published a story about his experience entitled "Hijacked to Hartford." Immediately following the story's publication, Pan Am sent him a new letter including a refund and a bunch of other stuff. He noted that all he really wanted was an apology.

    As he suggests in the book, we are not all writers for major publications so getting attention can be very difficult. But easier today than previously.

    Dave Carrol, a member of the music group Sons of Maxwell, traveled on United Airlines from Chicago to Omaha. He states that United Airlines mishandled his Taylor guitar (as viewed by several passengers) resulting in its destruction costing over $1500 to repair. He then spent one year trying to get United to make it right. They refused with all the usual excuses.

    While not a writer for the New York Times, Dave does have access to YouTube, as we all do. He created a video and posted it on YouTube. After getting 50,000 hits (he now has over 5 million views and a mention on CNN and Fox News) he got a call from United with an offer to "make it right." They also noted that his "... excellent video provides United with a unique learning opportunity that we would also like to use for training purposes..."

    We wish it were that easy for United to fix the root cause problem. Unfortunately, given one year and the countless people that Dave talked to, it is unlikely that United will fix this with training. We believe they think this was a just a PR problem and they looked for cover. Until they stop believing that passengers are an inconvenience to the efficient movement of airplanes, the root cause issue is likely to remain.

    Closing Thoughts

    We appreciate any feedback you can provide to help us make sure these Updates give you value each month. Feel free to respond to this e-mail with any comments or suggestions for future topics or ways we can make these Customer Manufacturing Updates more valuable to you.

    Thank you for your interest, and if we can provide any additional assistance in sales, marketing, strategy, or innovation to help you increase your sales, let us know.

    Our mission is to help you improve the performance of your System to Manufacture Customers®.

    Quick Links...


    Forward email

    Safe Unsubscribe
    This email was sent to mgooze@customermfg.com by mgooze@customermfg.com.

    Customer Manufacturing Group | 1900 Wyatt Drive, #11 | Santa Clara | CA | 95054